|
Sunday of the Passion, April 4, 2004 |
WATCHING DEATH DIE Introduction Going for the larger perspective Perhaps it is as true for theology as it is for cinematography. The passion account of Luke has been dissected from every angle. Did Luke really have a view of the atonement? Did Jesus die without cause simply as an innocent martyr? Perhaps he was the fulfillment of Isaiah’s suffering servant? Or simply a hero in the style of the Greeks? Theologians can lose their way in the details. Helpful to me, as I reflect on this conundrum, is one of the more treasured paintings in our home. The viewer looks past the burly shoulders of the centurion, past Mary, being comforted by John, and past Mary Magdalene. They are positioned at a distance from the crucifixion scene, as the text suggests, not, as is portrayed in Gibson’s Passion, almost groveling at the foot of the cross. In the center of the painting is Jesus, and close by the thief who will join him in paradise. To the far left, in darkness is the thief who rejected Christ. The artist, the last great painter of Canadian impressionism, Robert Anand, allows the viewer to ponder this scene along with these disciples through the swirling majestic brush strokes of his impressionist style. Here there are no details. In general, however, within the mystery and profundity of the portrayal, one captures meanings that will not let us go. Let’s pay attention to them for a moment. Glimpses from a distance Secondly, we watch leaders failing to lead. Pilate, according to Luke, can’t make a decision, so he seeks a way out when he discovers Jesus is from Galilee, Herod’s territory. Herod treats his subject with contempt because he regards him as unimportant. We know these tactics as well. There is a crisis of leadership in the United States right now. Enron has become a symbol for this crisis in which CEOs in many companies lack moral integrity, introducing sexual and financial scandals into the boardroom. They didn’t care about people and many lives experienced financial ruin in the aftermath of the collapse. Universities now develop programs in ethical leadership to attempt to provide what a previous generation ignored. Jesus became the victim of such amoral tactics. We know about them too, but this is no way to run a world. Thirdly, we watch mob pressure and crowd hysteria redefine justice. In response to Pilate’s claim that he will punish Jesus, the crowd shouts “away with him.” To Pilate’s decision to release him, they scream “crucify him.” And then we read, “Their shouts prevailed!” Vigilante rule! We know exactly what this is like. We had it in the pioneer days of our country and even through the beginning days of the civil rights movement in the U.S. We have experienced it with labor riots and race riots. We had psychological vigilante rule when, for example, the press inundated us with propaganda about potential anti-Semitism in Gibson’s Passion, and suddenly every TV commentator asked whether this could be tolerated in the U.S.! Jesus was a victim of such mindless extremism too. We know all about this, and it’s no way to run a world. Finally, in this story on the Sunday of the Passion we watch unchallenged cruelty masquerade as a legitimate lifestyle. People are allowed to ridicule and mock a fellow citizen. Punishment, torture and crucifixion are valid approaches of retribution, even in the highest seats of power. Luke quotes Jesus speaking a poignant proverb, “if this kind of thing happens in the green tree, what will happen in the dry?” Yet, we know all about this. We seem not to bat an eye when one of the highest rated television programs, NYPD Blues, allows Sipowitz to beat up the accused in the arraignment process. We cringe perhaps when we remember the stories of Matthew Shephard who was mauled and tied to a fence to die because he was gay or James Byrd who was hauled by a pickup-truck with chains until his head fell off because he was black. Jesus was the victim of such terrible things too. We know all about it, but it is no way to run a world. What you and I see from a distance as together we gain a perspective of the events of Holy Week from this Sunday of the Passion is that terrible things characterize this world in which we live. Dishonesty seems to triumph, leadership to flounder, mob rule to have its way and cruelty to be an accepted way of life. As Jesus comes to experience all of this first hand, he encounters all that is evil, all that is sinful in our world. In Jesus’ own death, brought at the hands of dishonest, unethical, hysterical and cruel people, God is naming that which is unacceptable in our world. In the death of Jesus, God is rejecting the unacceptable lifestyles of our own creation. At the cross he says “no” to all the evil that causes and creates death among us. The broader perspective in Holy Week which we cannot miss from this vantage point on the Sunday of the Passion is that in Jesus’ crucifixion we are watching death die! The View from the Cross itself In the controversial novel become a movie by Nikos Kazantzakis, The Last Temptation of Christ, Jesus, agonizing upon the cross, has some choices before him. He can choose to say “no” to this negation of death at the cross. He can return to other possibilties. He can seek a relationship with Mary Magdalene (which, of course, Dan Brown’s The DaVinci Code has him do). He can go back to all those things in life which seem so attractive, so fulfilling, so enticing. This is the last temptation! But he says “no” to this temptation, and with that he dies (putting an end to Brown’s thesis if only everyone had read Kazantzakis first!). Instead, he lets God in his own death negate all in this world that leads to dead ends and death itself. In the process, Kazantzakis allows the readers to know instead the life which is God’s choice for them. Conclusion
|
(top) |